Feasibility Analysis of a Roof Tile Factory Business Using a Capital Budgeting Approach


  • Famelga Clea Putri Universitas Indraprasta PGRI




payback period (PP), net present value (NPV), proftability index (PI), internal rate of return (IRR), capital budgeting


Natural content that supports the need for raw materials and materials needed is provided by the nature around us, such as various plants, soil, water, natural stones, and others. Most of them can be further processed into raw materials for construction products, such as roof tiles and other infrastructure facilities. The financial feasibility aspect is important considering that the business can be categorized as a project, which requires a long payback period based on the accounting period. During this time period there are various things that are full of uncertainty which are influenced by the rate of inflation and bank interest rates, so that the value of investments issued and the income or money obtained now will be different from the value of money in the future, which is called with the value of time rather than money. It is hoped that the analytical tool will be able to provide consideration, input and anticipation for the future of the roof tile manufacturing unit project by paying attention to capital budgeting, which can then be analyzed from a financial aspect through payback period (PP), net present value (NPV), profitability index ( PI) and internal rate of return (IRR). In the roof tile manufacturing business, the PBP is 1 year, 8 months, 6 days faster than the maximum period of 8 years of the project value, positive NPV of IDR 536,821,468, PI of 2,841 greater than number 1 and IRR of 14,835 greater than the cost value of capital 12%. As a basis for decision making through a capital budgeting approach through financial analysis.


Titik, 2005., Analisa Kelayakan Usaha Perkebunan Karet Melalui Pendekatan Capital Budgeting Pada PT Perkebunan Nusanatara IX Getas, Salatiga.

A. Senderovich, M. Weidlich, A. Gal, and A. Mandelbaum, “Queue mining–predicting delays in service processes,” in International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 2014, pp. 42–57.

Dhaiban, A.K., Comparison between Linear Programming Model and Optimal Control Model of Production–Inventory System, Current Science, 112(9), 2017, pp. 1855-1863.

H. Fitria, D. H. Widyaningrum, R. Malik, N. I. Safutra, and Y. Herdianzah, “Optimization Of Chicken Feed Production Using Goal Programming Method At PT. Japfa

Comfeed Indonesia Tbk. Unit Makassar,” J. Ind. Syst. Eng. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.56882/jisem.v1i1.3.

Husnan,Suad, Suwarsono, 2000., Studi Kelayakan Proyek, YKPN, Yogyakarta.

J. Abbas, “Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 244, p. 118806, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118806.

Umar, Husain, 2009., Studi Kelayakan Bisnis;Teknik Menganalisisi Kelayakan Bisnis Secara Komprehensif, Gramedia jakarta.

S. Supriyadi, G. Ramayanti, and A. C. Roberto, “Analisis Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Six Sigma,” in Prosiding SNTI dan SATELIT 2017, 2017, pp. 7–13.

Moeljadi, 2006., Manajemen Keuangan Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan kualitatif, Bayumedia,Malang.

Jumingan, 2009. Studi Kelayakan Bisnis; Teori dan Pembuatan Proposal Kelayakan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.




How to Cite

F. Clea Putri, “Feasibility Analysis of a Roof Tile Factory Business Using a Capital Budgeting Approach”, JISEM, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–64, Dec. 2023.